The Sundry Media of Electronic Literature
Abstract
The teaching of electronic literature, as well as the development of theoretical and methodological frameworks for its study, requires a transdisciplinary strategy. The phenomenon of the literary is not subject to technical supports as it is thought of as a phenomenon of language that is the product of creative reading. It´s teaching, consequently, must explore the epistemological opening and explore other fields in search of dialogue.Downloads
References
Bibliografía
Abbagnano, N. (2008). Diccionario de filosofía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Appleman, D. (2009). Critical Encounters in High School English: Teaching Literary Theory to Adolescents. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
Crawford, C. (2013). On Interactive Storytelling. Indianapolis, IN.: New Riders.
Derrida, J. (1985). La voz y el fenómeno. Introducción al problema del signo en la fenomenología de Husserl. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
Derrida, J. (1989). La escritura y la diferencia. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Frabetti, F. (2015). Software Theory. A cultural and Philosophical Study. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield.
Guindi, P. (2017). El estatuto del sujeto supuesto saber en la transmisión oral del psicoanálisis desde una perspectiva teórica de orientación lacaniana. En Acta Académica IX Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología XXIV Jornadas de Investigación XIII Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. (pp. 371-374).
Iser, W. (1980). The Act of Reading. A theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University.
Jayemanne, D. (2017). Performativity in Art, Literature, and Video Games. Dundee, Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan.
López-León, R. (2018). Contexto y diseño. El binomio invisible. Aguascalientes: Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.
Maestro, J. G. (1997). Introducción a la teoría de la literatura. Vigo: Universidad de Vigo.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through Technology. Chicago: Universidad de Chicago.
Ong, J. W. (2013). Oralidad y escritura: tecnologías de la palabra. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Rettberg, S. (2019). Electronic Literature. Cambridge: Polity.
Ricoeur, P. (2003). Teoría de la interpretación. Discurso y excedente de sentido. México: Siglo XXI.
Royle, N. (2000). Deconstructions: A User´s Guide. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Selden, R. (2010). Historia de la crítica literaria del siglo XX. Madrid: Akal.
Smith, F. (2012). Understanding Reading A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Nueva York: Routledge
Hemerografía
Coleman, L. y Kay, P. (1981). Prototype Semantics: The English Word Lie. Language, 57(1), 26-44.
Henao Villa, C. F.; García Arango, D. A.; Aguirre Mesa, E. D.; González García, A.; Bracho Aconcha, R.; Solorzano Movilla, J. G.; Arboleda Lopez, A. P. (2017). Multidisciplinariedad, interdisciplinariedad y transdisciplinariedad en la formación para la investigación en ingeniería. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 14(1), 179-197.
Kattenbelt, Ch. (2008). Intermediality in Theatre and Performance: Definitions, Perceptions and Medial Relationships. Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universidad Jaume, 6, 19-29.
Meyer, J. (1997). "What is literature? A definition based on prototypes". Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session, 41. DOI: 10.31356/silwp.vol41.03
Nake, F. y Grabowski, S. (2017). Think the Image, Don't Make It! On Algorithmic Thinking, Art Education, and Re-Coding. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 9(3), 21-31.
Paoli Bolio, F. J. (2019). Multi, inter y transdisciplinariedad. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho, (13), 347-357. DOI: 10.22201/iij.24487937e.2019.13
Passati, L. M. (2020). Towards a Hermeneutic Definition of Software. Humanities And Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020
Rettberg, S. (2020). Teaching electronic literature using electronic literature. MATLIT: Materialidades da Literatura, 8(1), 23-44.
Reyes Rivas, M. A. R. (2016). Modernidad, Modernismo y Tecnología: concepciones y valoraciones. Revista Comunicación, 25(2), 48-56.
Wagner, P. (2017). Progreso y Modernidad: el problema de la autonomía. Sociología Histórica. De la modernidad a las modernidades múltiples, (7), 95-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/sh
Cibergrafía:
IBM (2022). https://www.ibm.com/mx-es/topics/open-source
Red Hat (2022). https://www.redhat.com
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Fuentes Humanísticas is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which allows third parties to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contribution under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors may enter into other independent and additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article in this journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
